Large networks often use a systematic naming scheme, such as using a location (e.g. a department) plus a purpose to generate a name for a computer. However, smaller networks will frequently use a more personalized naming scheme to keep track of the many hosts. Network naming can be hierarchical in nature, such as the Internet's Domain Name System. Indeed, the Internet employs several universally applicable naming methods: Uniform Resource Names (URN), Uniform Resource Locators (URL), and Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI).
A good naming scheme is scalable, unique, and easy to remember. The purpose of these naming schemes is to name network computers, but it can also be used to name projects, variables, streets, pets, kids, or any other project where unique names and remember able names are required.
There are three main approaches to naming files:
- Files are named with a combination of host and local name.
* This guarantees a unique name.
* It is neither location transparent nor location independent.
* Same naming works on local and remote files.
- Remote directories are mounted to local directories.
* A local system seems to have a coherent directory structure.
* The remote directories must be explicitly mounted. The files are location independent.
* SUN (Network File System)NFS is a good example of this technique.
- A single global name structure spans all the files in the system.
* The DFS is built in the same way as a local file system.
* It is location independent.
Thursday, February 4, 2010
Naming Schemes of Distributed file systems
Posted by Sunflower at 2/04/2010 10:11:00 AM
Labels: Approach, DFS, Distributed file systems, File systems, files, Global, Locales, Naming, Naming Schemes, Operating Systems
Subscribe by Email |
|
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment