Enhancing Product Design: Collaboration Between Product Managers and Usability Experts

The collaboration between a product manager and a usability expert is one of the most important yet often understated aspects of successful software development. Each plays a distinct but interdependent role in shaping the final product, and when their efforts are aligned, the result is a well-designed, user-friendly product that addresses real-world needs.

The Role of a Product Manager in the Development Lifecycle

The product manager is the guiding force throughout the product development or project execution cycle. They are deeply involved at every step — from defining initial requirements to guiding development teams, validating workflows, and ensuring that customer expectations are met.

Some of the core responsibilities of a product manager include:

• Delivering detailed feature requirements to the engineering teams.

• Collaborating with developers during the design and implementation stages.

• Providing critical clarifications when edge cases or gaps appear in design documentation.

• Conducting testing — particularly of newly developed or modified features — to ensure the experience aligns with expectations.

• Participating in beta programs and collecting feedback from early users.

• Helping to prioritize defect fixes based on feedback severity and customer impact.

In essence, the product manager acts as the bridge between customer needs, business goals, and the engineering team’s execution.

The Strategic Role of Usability Experts

While usability experts may not be involved throughout the entire cycle like product managers, their role is essential — especially during the early design phases. Usability experts focus on how a product "feels" and functions from the user’s perspective, aiming to make interfaces intuitive, appealing, and efficient.

One particular cycle that stands out involved a comprehensive redesign of a mature software product. The product team had compiled multiple user complaints, feature requests, and visual feedback from previous versions. Alongside this, the interface was beginning to feel outdated.

To gain executive buy-in for the redesign, we had to articulate the vision clearly. Phrases like “modernizing the interface” or “improving the user journey” resonated surprisingly well — especially when backed by usability metrics and customer sentiment analysis.

When the Real Interaction Begins

In situations like a full UI overhaul, the interaction between the product manager and the usability expert can begin even before a development cycle formally ends. Planning, ideation, and initial wireframes often start in parallel with the finalization of the current release.

Several key sources guide their collaboration:

• Customer complaints and forum feedback: Recurring pain points or requests indicate problem areas.

• Expert analysis: Usability specialists often identify issues by examining screen flows, layout consistency, or call-to-action placements.

• Product manager insights: Based on product knowledge and user feedback, the PM often has a list of areas needing attention.

• Technical limitations or new opportunities: Sometimes UI changes are driven by backend modifications or updated component libraries that enable previously impossible workflows.

A Cyclical Design Process

Usability improvements aren’t achieved in a single pass. Typically, the usability expert begins by proposing a refreshed flow or layout for a screen. The product manager and other stakeholders review the changes, offering insights and critiques. Based on that feedback, the next iteration is refined and validated.

This process repeats across numerous screens and workflows. In large products, it’s rarely feasible to redesign all screens simultaneously. Instead, the usability expert works iteratively, and teams begin implementation as soon as screens are finalized.

Here, the product manager’s role becomes even more crucial. They can help drive the process forward by working alongside the usability expert to:

• Prioritize which screens or workflows should be tackled first.

• Ensure engineering teams receive enough detail to begin development.

• Translate early wireframes into preliminary requirements that can evolve as designs solidify.

Project Management and Scheduling

Managing a UI redesign project involving multiple stakeholders is no small task. It requires deft project management, clear communication, and tight scheduling. Project managers often rely heavily on product managers to coordinate with usability teams and ensure timely delivery.

The agile model can be particularly effective here. Breaking down the redesign into sprints, assigning specific screens or modules per sprint, and tracking feedback cycles keeps momentum going and avoids analysis paralysis.

Measuring the Impact of Product Manager and Usability Expert Collaboration

While the collaborative process may seem time-consuming, the benefits are immense:

• Better user experience (UX): Directly correlates with increased user satisfaction and engagement.

• Fewer design iterations post-launch: Reduces rework and development time.

• Clearer workflows and screens: Improve usability scores and reduce support tickets.

• Stronger stakeholder alignment: Ensures fewer surprises late in the development cycle.

Ultimately, products created through strong product manager–usability expert collaboration deliver more value and are more likely to succeed in competitive markets.

Final Thoughts

Whether it’s a small feature update or a complete redesign, the bond between the product manager and the usability expert is essential. By bringing together customer insight, technical knowledge, and design thinking, they create experiences that not only look good but work well — delivering tangible value to end users.

If your team is preparing for a UI refresh or tackling a complex workflow change, investing in this collaboration early can make the difference between mediocre and exceptional.

Suggested Amazon Books on Product and Usability Collaboration

• Don't Make Me Think by Steve Krug (Buy - Affiliate link)

• Inspired: How to Create Tech Products Customers Love by Marty Cagan (Buy - Affiliate link)

• The Design of Everyday Things by Don Norman (Buy - Affiliate link)

Helpful YouTube Videos on Product Management & Usability Design

UX Design: What Product Managers Need To Know

What is UX? User Experience Explained For Beginners

---

Who Should Present? Choosing the Right Speaker for Effective Team Presentations

Presentations are a core part of professional life, particularly in product development, software engineering, and corporate operations. While many discussions revolve around what to present — the data, visuals, top-level summaries, and backup analytics — an equally crucial but often overlooked question is: Who should present?

As with most nuanced decisions in the business world, there’s no one-size-fits-all answer. The right presenter depends on the context, content, audience, and even the personalities on the team. However, several key considerations can guide you toward the right decision.

1. Importance of the Presentation

One of the first filters is the significance of the meeting:

• High-Impact Meetings: If you're launching a new project, meeting with senior stakeholders, or conducting a quarterly business review, you want your most effective communicator at the helm. This isn’t the time for experimentation. The presenter should be articulate, well-informed, and confident under pressure. Typically, this is the team lead or project manager.

• Routine or Internal Meetings: In contrast, regular weekly sync-ups, internal demos, or less formal stakeholder updates provide a great opportunity to share the spotlight. These meetings allow junior team members to build experience and grow in visibility without the risk of negatively affecting external perception.

2. Team Member Inclination and Readiness

Presentation skills vary widely across individuals:

• Some team members enjoy being in the spotlight. They are confident, energetic, and naturally command attention.

• Others are more reserved. Forcing them into a public speaking role may not only yield suboptimal results but could also negatively affect their motivation.

Understanding your team's comfort level with public speaking is essential. However, with encouragement and coaching, many introverts have gone on to become strong presenters.

3. Match the Presenter to the Content

Aligning the right person with the right message makes a major difference:

• Data-Driven Presentations: These require someone who deeply understands the metrics and can navigate through analytics. They should be able to break down complex insights into simple takeaways.

• Requirement or Strategy Discussions: When discussing customer journeys, product flows, or future features, someone close to product thinking — like a product manager — is ideal.

It’s not about who ranks highest. It’s about who knows the material best and can speak to it clearly.

4. Splitting the Workload

In some meetings, it’s perfectly reasonable — even beneficial — to have multiple presenters. For example:

• The project manager opens the meeting and provides context.

• The business analyst or data scientist presents the analytical component.

• The developer walks through the technical demo.

This structure distributes the load, keeps the audience engaged, and provides broader exposure to your team’s talent.

5. Use Regular Meetings as Training Grounds

Not every meeting needs a polished, senior-level speaker. Internal presentations can serve as great training opportunities. Rotate team members through presentation roles in lower-stakes settings to:

• Develop public speaking skills.

• Build team confidence.

• Increase cross-functional understanding.

Eventually, you’ll have a team where multiple members are ready to present confidently in high-stakes situations.

6. Preparation and Support Are Key

Regardless of who presents, preparation makes all the difference:

• Have a dry run.

• Provide speaker notes or a clear outline.

• Offer support — from slide creation to backup answers for likely questions.

A well-prepared but inexperienced speaker can outperform a seasoned speaker who isn’t engaged.

7. Balance Visibility with Outcomes

Letting newer team members take the stage is important for development, but not at the cost of the meeting’s objective. If the stakes are high, ensure that:

• Senior leaders are briefed.

• The core message is reinforced.

• The presenter is backed up by others on the call in case questions arise.

You can also position newer speakers as co-presenters or assistants to more seasoned speakers.

8. Tailoring for the Audience

Always ask: Who is in the room?

• Senior executives typically want a short, crisp update with clear business implications.

• Technical stakeholders may want a deeper dive into the architecture or code changes.

• Customers may want to see how the solution addresses their pain points.

Match the presenter’s communication style and depth of knowledge with what the audience values most.

Final Thoughts

Choosing the right presenter is both an art and a science. It takes knowing your audience, understanding your content, evaluating your team, and making a strategic choice based on the stakes of the meeting.

While many organizations rely on default hierarchies — assuming the most senior person should always present — the most effective teams empower and equip a range of voices to represent the group.

Training, encouragement, feedback, and thoughtful selection are all part of growing a high-performing, presentation-ready team.

Suggested Amazon Books on Public Speaking and Team Communication

• Talk Like TED by Carmine Gallo (Buy book - Affiliate link)

• Presentation Zen by Garr Reynolds (Buy book - Affiliate link)

• The Art of Public Speaking by Dale Carnegie (Buy book - Affiliate link)

The Unseen Barrier: Why Usability and Readability Are Crucial for Effective Design

The Unseen Barrier: Why Usability and Readability Are Crucial for Effective Design (And What a Gas Station Sign Taught Me)

Recently, I had a simple yet profoundly illustrative experience while driving. I was passing a familiar gas station next to the highway, one I’d driven by countless times. This time, however, a brand-new, brightly lit board caught my eye, announcing some new eating options available there. Normally, even at highway speeds, I can quickly scan and comprehend such signs. But this particular board was different. The names of the food outlets were rendered in an elaborate, fancy script. In the fleeting moments I had while driving past, my brain struggled to decipher the ornate lettering. It wasn't that the words were complex, but the style of the text made them incredibly difficult to process rapidly. I asked the other people in the car if they’d managed to read the names – a unanimous "no" was the answer. We simply didn't have enough time to decode the visual puzzle before we'd sped past. Interestingly, this wasn't an issue with other signboards along the same stretch of road that used plain, simple, and instantly legible scripts.

This seemingly minor incident immediately brought my years of experience in the IT industry flooding back, specifically the countless discussions, debates, and sometimes hard-won battles surrounding usability and user experience (UX). If that gas station signboard had been designed after consulting with a usability expert, the outcome would likely have been very different. The expert would have immediately recognized the primary use case: drivers needing to make a quick decision, often at speed, about whether to stop. They would have championed a design that prioritized instant readability, ensuring potential customers could grasp the information and perhaps be enticed to pull over before they’d missed their chance. Instead, a visually "fancy" choice likely resulted in lost opportunities.

And this, in essence, is what usability is all about. It's about designing with the end-user firmly in mind, ensuring that whatever we create – be it a physical sign, a software interface, a website, or a mobile app – is not just functional, but also intuitive, efficient, and satisfying to use.

The Core of Usability: Designing for the User, Not for Ourselves

When we embark on the design of any new user-facing element, whether it's a completely new software screen, a redesign of an existing interface, or even something as seemingly simple as a public notice, the paramount question should always be: "How will this look and function for the users?" This might sound obvious, but it’s a principle that is surprisingly easy to overlook, especially by those deeply embedded in the creation process.

The team behind a product – the developers, the testers, the product managers – lives and breathes that product day in and day out. They develop an intimate familiarity with its intricacies, its workflows, and its terminology. This deep immersion, while beneficial for development, can inadvertently create blind spots. What seems perfectly logical and intuitive to an internal team member might be confusing or cumbersome to a first-time user or even a regular user approaching a feature from a different context. This is precisely why the role of a usability expert (often a UX Designer, UX Researcher, or Human Factors Specialist) is so incredibly vital.

The Usability Expert: An Indispensable Advocate for the User

A usability expert brings an objective, user-centered perspective to the design process. Their expertise lies in understanding human-computer interaction, cognitive psychology, information architecture, and interaction design principles. They employ various methodologies – user research, persona development, journey mapping, wireframing, prototyping, and, crucially, usability testing – to ensure that the design is:

1. Effective: Can users successfully achieve their goals? (e.g., Can a driver read the sign and understand the offerings?)

2. Efficient: How much effort (time, clicks, cognitive load) does it take for users to achieve their goals? (e.g., Can the sign be read in the 2-3 seconds available?)

3. Engaging: Is the interaction pleasant and appropriate for the user and the context? (While less critical for a highway sign, still relevant for its visual appeal and non-distracting nature).

4. Error Tolerant: How well does the system prevent errors, and how well does it help users recover from them?

5. Easy to Learn: How quickly can a new user become proficient?

In the case of my gas station sign, a usability expert would have flagged the fancy script as a major impediment to efficiency and effectiveness given the specific "user" (a driver at speed) and the "task" (quickly identifying food options). They would have advocated for clear, high-contrast, sans-serif fonts known for their legibility at a distance and with brief exposure.

The Challenge of Internal Resistance: "We Know What the Customer Wants"

It's important to emphasize a common hurdle: internal resistance to the recommendations of usability experts. I've witnessed numerous instances where development teams, deeply invested and proud of their work, feel they inherently understand what the customer wants. They might perceive usability-driven changes to workflows or screen designs as unnecessary, an underestimation of the user's intelligence, or even as a criticism of their existing efforts.

There are specific examples I recall where a usability expert, backed by user testing data, recommended significant changes to a complex software screen or a convoluted workflow. The development team, having worked on the product for so long, often struggled to appreciate the user's pain points. Their arguments might include:

• "Users will get used to it."

• "It’s powerful; they just need to learn it."

• "Changing it now will be too much work."

• "Our current users haven't complained that much."

This resistance isn't usually born out of malice, but rather from a combination of familiarity blindness (the "curse of knowledge"), attachment to one's own creations, and sometimes, a lack of direct, unfiltered exposure to genuine user struggles.

Bridging the Gap: Fostering Empathy Within Development Teams

So, how can organizations ensure that the invaluable insights of usability experts are not just heard but embraced and acted upon? One of the most effective ways is to cultivate empathy for the user directly within the development and product teams. Simply presenting usability reports isn't always enough; teams need to feel the user's experience.

Here are some powerful strategies:

1. Direct Exposure to User Feedback:

   • User Forums and Community Channels: Encourage team members (not just support staff) to regularly monitor user forums, social media discussions, and online communities related to the product. Reading firsthand accounts of frustrations, confusion, and desired features can be incredibly eye-opening.

   • Customer Support Tickets and Defect Logs: Analyzing patterns in support tickets and customer-logged defects can highlight recurring usability issues that might not be obvious from an internal perspective. This is raw data directly from the trenches.

2. Active Participation in User Research and Testing:

   • Observing Usability Tests: Having developers, testers, and product managers observe live (or recorded) usability testing sessions is perhaps the most impactful way to build empathy. Watching a real user struggle with an interface they helped build, click in the wrong places, or express confusion can be a humbling and highly motivating experience. It shifts the perspective from "the user should know this" to "how can we make this clearer?"

   • Beta Programs: Encourage active participation in beta programs, not just for bug hunting, but for interacting directly with beta users. Soliciting feedback on new designs and workflows during the beta phase allows for course correction before a wider release.

   • "Dogfooding" (Using Your Own Product): While valuable, dogfooding alone isn't enough, as internal users are still subject to familiarity bias. However, it can help identify glaring issues.

3. Involving Users Early and Often:

   • Don't wait until the end to test usability. Incorporate user feedback loops throughout the design and development process, from early concepts and wireframes to interactive prototypes. This iterative approach makes changes less daunting and more collaborative.

4. Creating User Personas and Journey Maps:

   • These tools, often developed by UX professionals, help the entire team visualize and empathize with different types_of users and their experiences interacting with the product to achieve their goals. They make the abstract "user" more concrete and relatable.

When team members witness firsthand the challenges users face, their perspective on what is "important for the product" often undergoes a rapid and significant transformation. The focus shifts from internal logic or technical elegance (though still important) towards genuine user-centricity. The fancy script on the gas station sign, which might have looked aesthetically pleasing to its creators in isolation, would quickly be seen as a functional failure when viewed through the lens of a driver’s fleeting glance.

Readability: A Cornerstone of Usability

The gas station example specifically highlights the critical role of readability within the broader concept of usability. Readability refers to the ease with which a reader can understand a written text. In visual design, this extends to:

• Typography: Choice of font (serif vs. sans-serif, script vs. block), font size, weight, line spacing (leading), and line length. For quick scanning (like a highway sign or a button label), sans-serif fonts are generally preferred for their clarity.

• Contrast: The difference in brightness or color between the text and its background. High contrast (e.g., black text on a white background, or vice-versa) is crucial for legibility, especially for users with visual impairments or in varying lighting conditions.

• Layout and Whitespace: How text is arranged on the page or screen. Adequate whitespace (negative space) around text blocks reduces clutter and improves focus.

• Language and Wording: Using clear, concise, and simple language, avoiding jargon or overly complex sentence structures.

Poor readability creates a cognitive burden, forcing users to expend more mental effort to simply understand the information presented, let alone act upon it. This can lead to frustration, errors, and abandonment of a task or product.

Conclusion: Prioritizing Clarity for User Success

The simple act of choosing a fancy, hard-to-read script for a highway sign serves as a potent metaphor for a common pitfall in design: prioritizing aesthetics or internal preferences over fundamental usability and the user's actual context. Whether designing a physical object, a software interface, or a piece of written communication, the principles remain the same. If the intended audience cannot easily perceive, understand, and interact with the design to achieve their goals, then the design, no matter how clever or visually appealing to its creators, has ultimately failed.

Investing in usability expertise, fostering a culture of user empathy within development teams, and paying close attention to foundational elements like readability are not just "nice-to-haves"; they are essential ingredients for creating products and experiences that are effective, efficient, and genuinely valued by the people they are meant to serve. After all, the goal isn't just to display information or offer functionality, but to ensure it can be effortlessly accessed and utilized, turning a fleeting glance into a satisfied customer, or a complex task into a smooth interaction.

Further References & Learning:

Books on Usability, UX Design, and Readability:

1. "Don't Make Me Think, Revisited: A Common Sense Approach to Web Usability" by Steve Krug (Buy book - Affiliate link) A foundational, highly readable classic on web usability principles.

2. "The Design of Everyday Things" by Don Norman (Buy book - affiliate link) Explores the psychology of how people interact with objects and systems, crucial for understanding usability.

3. "About Face: The Essentials of Interaction Design" by Alan Cooper, Robert Reimann, David Cronin, Christopher Noessel (Buy book - affiliate link) A comprehensive guide to interaction design principles and practices.

4. "Measuring the User Experience: Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics" by Tom Tullis and Bill Albert (Buy book - Affiliate link) For those interested in quantifying usability.

5. "Letting Go of the Words: Writing Web Content that Works" by Janice (Ginny) Redish (Buy book - affiliate link) Focuses on writing clear, user-centered content.

6. "Typography for Lawyers" by Matthew Butterick (Buy book - affiliate link) (surprisingly relevant for anyone wanting to understand document readability and professional typography).